Skip to main content

About your Search

20130302
20130310
STATION
MSNBCW 3
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
MSNBC
Mar 9, 2013 5:00am PST
and appropriate under the constitution and applicable laws of the united states for the president to authorize the militia tar to use lethal force within the territory of the united states. holder's response seems to crystallize, the worst fears of many of the administration's targeted killing policy. and the broad assertion of presidential power that undergirds. paul seized on that wednesday summarizing his exchange withholder on the floor. >> when i asked the president, you can kill an american on american soil, it should have been an easy answer. it's an easy question. it should have been a resounding and unequivocal no. the president's response, he hasn't killed anyone yet. we're supposed to be comforted by that. the president says i haven't killed anyone yet. he goes on to say, and i have no intention of killing americans. but i might. is that enough? are we satisfied by that? >> on thursday, attorney general holder responded to paul's filibuster by clarifying the administration's position. it's come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question, does the president have t
MSNBC
Mar 3, 2013 5:00am PST
their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. the only thing republicans want more than getting out social security and entitlements is not compromising with the president. that seems to be the case to me. they are being handed this. the president said we will go with you and make the cuts and they said no, we don't want them. >> to understand the republican position you have to understand that their major objective goals one, two, and three is shielding high income people from any tax increase. that's where it hits. they also say they are for smaller government, but since they as you suggest and you do as well, don't want to touch the entitlements for ten years and then after that probably another ten years. that doesn't leave a lot, but they are wacking away with the budget and tends to fall on low income people. >> i disagree entirely. republicans don't want to cut entitlements and i would argue they want to save entitlements. that's what you see in house republican budgets that have passed the house. >> by makin
MSNBC
Mar 2, 2013 5:00am PST
of racial equality. of course, achieving racial equality required applications of laws, metrics and approaches that are race conscious. universities committed to diverse student bodies need to consider the ethnicity of their applicants and school districts committed to integration need to monitor and track the racial makeup of their student body. the roberts' court conservative justices have no decent from this. roberts proclaimed he found the intense involve innocent in achieving that an icky business. it is a sordid business. this divvying us up by race. roberts with the factual declaration the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. that sentence is a perfect distillation of the jurisprudence on race with the adolescent soft history. it's a short distance from that reasoning to asking why there isn't a white history month? roberts' history of color blindness requires the courts to simply ignore or forget the actual history of institutions and laws and traditions and cultures. the lived experience of human beings embedded
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3